<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 5 mac tools for web development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mostof.it/top-5-mac-tools-for-web-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mostof.it/top-5-mac-tools-for-web-development/</link>
	<description>Where the rising ape meets the falling angel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:19:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: S!</title>
		<link>http://blog.mostof.it/top-5-mac-tools-for-web-development/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>S!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 13:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mostof.it/?p=174#comment-152</guid>
		<description>@David, 
The key difference for me is that Coda remembers which files you have updated and gives you an &#039;upload all changed&#039; option. This means you can update and test locally then hit the button to send it all up via FTP. I find it annoying having to remember which files in which folders have been changed and Cyberduck&#039;s synchronisation feature has to check the timestamp on every file so takes ages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David,<br />
The key difference for me is that Coda remembers which files you have updated and gives you an &#8216;upload all changed&#8217; option. This means you can update and test locally then hit the button to send it all up via FTP. I find it annoying having to remember which files in which folders have been changed and Cyberduck&#8217;s synchronisation feature has to check the timestamp on every file so takes ages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ochronus</title>
		<link>http://blog.mostof.it/top-5-mac-tools-for-web-development/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>ochronus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 05:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mostof.it/?p=174#comment-151</guid>
		<description>@David, Coda handles this in one window, it&#039;s a bit more integrated and convenient for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David, Coda handles this in one window, it&#8217;s a bit more integrated and convenient for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.mostof.it/top-5-mac-tools-for-web-development/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 23:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mostof.it/?p=174#comment-150</guid>
		<description>I have been using Cyberduck to handle remote editing connections for TextMate. Does Coda do something different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Cyberduck to handle remote editing connections for TextMate. Does Coda do something different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 5 mac tools for web development &#124; implements Developer { &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</title>
		<link>http://blog.mostof.it/top-5-mac-tools-for-web-development/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 5 mac tools for web development &#124; implements Developer { &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mostof.it/?p=174#comment-149</guid>
		<description>[...] more here: Top 5 mac tools for web development &#124; implements Developer {   Share and [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here: Top 5 mac tools for web development | implements Developer {   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

